Author Topic: Twitter Bans RT and Sputnik  (Read 43 times)

Solon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1310
    • View Profile
Twitter Bans RT and Sputnik
« on: October 27, 2017, 08:36:41 AM »
Unlike Facebook and Google, Twitter has taken an aggressive stance toward Russian media buyers who interfered in the 2016 US election. The full story of the self-serving deals between US social media giants and Russian hackers, government media agencies, and bots remains unknown. To cover its own culpability, Twitter banned both RT and Sputnik as of yesterday. RT, however, didn't take that without its own protest. It raises the question as to how aggressive were these media giants not just in publishing this Russian interference but in soliciting it. Did they sell out democracy for cash?

Quote
In a statement published on Thursday, October 26, Twitter announced that it is “off-boarding” all advertising from accounts owned by RT and Sputnik, the two Russian-government-controlled media outlets accused by the American intelligence community of trying to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

    Twitter cited its own “retrospective work” and “the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that both RT and Sputnik attempted to interfere with the election on behalf of the Russian government.”

    Twitter says it will also donate $1.9 million (the amount of money the company earned from RT global advertising since it became an advertiser in 2011) to “support external research into the use of Twitter in civic engagement and elections, including use of malicious automation and misinformation, with an initial focus on elections and automation.”

But RT says Twitter actually solicited it for even more election ads

RT says Twitter actually pushed it to purchase a large number of ads during the 2016 U.S. election, but the channel turned down the offer. On October 26, RT published an article stating that Twitter's actions “compel us to reveal the details of the 2016 negotiations during which Twitter representatives pitched to RT a large-sum advertising proposal.” The first meetings in these negotiations reportedly took place in April 2016, involving “senior marketing and news partnerships managers from Twitter.” The main idea RT says Twitter pitched was for the network to “take a stand.” RT says it eventually declined the offer, deciding that the ads were too expensive.


Twitter drops all ads from Russia Today and Sputnik, citing 2016 U.S. election interference
https://meduza.io/en/news/2017/10/26/twitter-bans-all-ads-from-russia-today-and-sputnik-citing-2016-u-s-election-interference

Note: Meduza is an independent Russian news site publishing in Latvia to escape Russian government control. No one should confuse that for an anti-Russian stance. That merely means that it will publish criticism of the Putin government and allow his opponents to speak.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2017, 08:43:58 AM by Solon »
On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last, and the White House will be occupied by a downright fool and a complete narcissistic moron.
...H. L. Mencken

Steven

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 363
    • View Profile
Re: Twitter Bans RT and Sputnik
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2017, 08:43:28 AM »
"Including malicious use of automation and misinformation"  Did I read that right? Did Twitter say this what they will do with the $1.9 million?

Solon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1310
    • View Profile
Re: Twitter Bans RT and Sputnik
« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2017, 02:33:05 PM »
Facebook claims Russian ads reached 126 million viewers during the 2016 political campaign. Somebody's raking in a lot of cash! Why didn't I think of something like that when I first signed up for CompuServe? LOL  Oh, I remember now. A 1 megabyte external drive cost $1,000. Yeah, I said ONE MEGABYTE.

The rest of this story is no laughing matter.

Quote
Russian agents intending to sow discord among American citizens disseminated inflammatory posts that reached 126 million users on Facebook, published more than 131,000 messages on Twitter and uploaded over 1,000 videos to Google’s YouTube service, according to copies of prepared remarks from the companies that were obtained by The New York Times.

The detailed disclosures, sent to Congress on Monday by companies whose products are among the most widely used on the internet, came before a series of congressional hearings this week into how third parties used social networks and online services to influence millions of Americans before the 2016 presidential election.

The new information goes far beyond what the companies have revealed in the past and underline the breadth of the Kremlin’s efforts to lever open divisions in the United States using American technology platforms, especially Facebook.

Russian Influence Reached 126 Million Through Facebook Alone
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/technology/facebook-google-russia.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last, and the White House will be occupied by a downright fool and a complete narcissistic moron.
...H. L. Mencken